Normal view MARC view ISBD view

A question of legitimacy : Afghans’ perceptions about legitimacy in the current Karzai government / Afghanistan Rights Monitor (ARM).

Material type: Text

TextLanguage: Publication details: [Kabul] : Afghanistan Rights Monitor (ARM), 2009.Description: 2 p. ; 30 cmSubject(s):

DDC classification:

Pamphlet JQ 1765 .Q35 .Q84 /2009

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 5 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Status	Date due	Barcode	Item holds
Books	Afghanistan Centre at Kabul University	Pamphlet JQ 1765 .Q35 .Q84 /2009 (Browse shelf(Opens below))	Available		16757

Total holds: 0

Browsing Afghanistan Centre at Kabul University shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous								Next
Previous	Pamphlet HV 4132.6 .A5 .S38 /2006 Searching for security : urban livelihoods in Kabul / Stefan Schütte.	Searching for security : urban livelihoods in Kabul / Stefan Schütte.	Searching for security : urban livelihoods in Kabul / Stefan Schütte.	Pamphlet JQ 1765 .Q35 .Q84 /2009 A question of legitimacy : Afghans’ perceptions about legitimacy in the current Karzai government / Afghanistan Rights Monitor (ARM).	PN 6519 .P8 پ25 1358 Pashtu proverbs [Pashtu, Dari, English] / selected and translated into Dari by A. R. Benawa, translated into English by A. M. Shinwari	PK 6801 ک49 1383 the history literature of Afghanistan : five teachers [Dari] / Ahmad Ali Kohzad ... [et. al].	Pamphlet HQ 1735.6 .A34 2003 The Afghan Womens Network : 2003 strategic plan / The Afghan Women’s Network.	Next

Caption title.

“Afghanistan Rights Monitor (ARM)”—at the head of title.

“November 2009”.

Summary : “The Afghanistan Rights Monitor (ARM) conducted a rapid survey in the country to gauge peoples’ perceptions about democracy and legitimacy in the new Karzai government as per their civil and political rights. We asked three key questions from 500 people, male and female, in the provincial cities of all 34 provinces. The 500 interviewees were asked about their perception of legitimacy in the Karzai government after the august 20th presidential election, the importance of political legitimacy and whether or not legitimacy can be revived or lost in the coming five years”—(p. 1).