000			02857nam a2200325Ia 4500
003			OSt
005			20151125045111.0
008			120912s9999 xx 000 0 und d
040			_cACKU
043			_aa-af---
082			_aPamphlet JQ 1765 .A55 .A34 /2009/ + /PDF/(1.77MB)
110			_aUnited States. Office of the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR).
245			_aAfghanistan’s High Office of Oversight needs significantly strengthened authority, independence, and donor support to become an effective anti-corruption institution.
260			_aArlington, Va. [United States] : SIGAR, 2009.
300			_aiii, 20 p. ; 30 cm.
500			_aCover title.
500			_a“December 16, 2009”.
500			_a“Office of the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction”—at head of title.
500			_a“SIGAR audit-10-2 High Office of Oversight”—cover page.
500			_aIncludes bibliographical references.
500			_aSummary: “The strengthening of institutions that implement anti-corruption measures in Afghanistan is a key operational principle of the U.S. Government’s draft Anti-Corruption Strategy. Afghanistan’s High Office of Oversight (HOO) was established by President Karzai in July 2008 to oversee and coordinate national efforts to combat corruption in accordance with Afghanistan’s own anti-corruption strategy under its Afghanistan National Development Strategy. During this audit, SIGAR (1) reviewed the assistance provided by the United States and other donors to strengthen the institutional development of the HOO, (2) assessed the capabilities and performance of the HOO in fulfilling its mandate, and (3) assessed U.S. assistance to the HOO. This report is part of a series of audits addressing U.S. efforts to combat corruption and strengthen the rule of law in Afghanistan. SIGAR conducted this performance audit in Kabul, Afghanistan and Washington, D.C. from September to November 2009 in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards”—(p. 1).
500			_aContents: Background—International support has enabled the HOO to begin several anti-corruption efforts—The HOO has significant gaps in its operational capacity—The HOO needs more coordinated support and commitment from the United States—Conclusions—Recommendations—Comments—Appendix I.—Appendix II—Tables—Abbreviations.
650			_aCorruption – Afghanistan.
650			_aPolitical corruption – Afghanistan.
650			_aAfghanistan. High Office of Oversight – Evaluation.
650			_aPostwar reconstruction – Afghanistan – Evaluation.
856			_uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2458/azu_acku_pamphlet_jq1765_a55_a34_2009 _zScanned for ACKU. _qPDF
906			_a8930
942			_2lcc _cMON _kazu_acku_pamphlet_jq1765_a55_a34_2009
999			_c20167 _d20167