Vulnerability to corruption assessment of teacher recruitment in the ministry of education / Independent Joint Anti-Corruption Monitoring and Evaluation Committee.
Material type:
TextLanguage: English Publication details: Kabul, Afghanistan : Independent Joint Anti-Corruption Monitoring and Evaluation Committee, 2015.Description: 13 pages ; 30 cmSubject(s): LOC classification: - Pamphlet JQ1765. A55.
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Monograph
|
Afghanistan Centre at Kabul University | Pamphlet JQ1765.A55.V886 2015 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 3ACKU000503739 |
Browsing Afghanistan Centre at Kabul University shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| Pamphlet JQ1765.A55.V338 2015 Vulnerability to corruption assessment on Wasaeq registration : (VCA Unit) / | Pamphlet JQ1765.A55.V836 2014 Vulnerability to corruption assessment on corruption case processing in Afghanistan | Pamphlet JQ1765.A55.V838 2015 Vulnerability to corruption assessment of the payment system for martyrs and persons disabled by conflict / | Pamphlet JQ1765.A55.V886 2015 Vulnerability to corruption assessment of teacher recruitment in the ministry of education / | Pamphlet JQ1765.S336 2016 Rethinking stability for Afghanistan : | Pamphlet JQ1767.A46 2012 The overview of traditional Jirga in Afghanistan / | Pamphlet JQ1767.A533 2011 Aid and conflict in Afghanistan. |
Cover title.
“June 2015”.
“Independent Joint Anti-Corruption Monitoring and Evaluation Committee”—at head of title.
Includes bibliographical references.
Summary: “This Vulnerability to Corruption Assessment (VCA) focuses on the teacher recruitment process of the Ministry of Education (MOE). It examines a range of legal, regulatory, institutional, and process issues to identify corruption vulnerabilities and possible solutions for addressing them. The VCA not only reveals numerous corruption vulnerabilities, but possible evidence of corruption as well. Among the vulnerabilities identified were lack of oversight, poorly defined procedures, and a process that is easily subjected to fraud and manipulation…”—(page 3).
English