Independent report for the Department of International Development (DFID) : testing hypotheses on radicalisation in Afghanistan / Sarah Ladbury.
Material type:
TextLanguage: English Publication details: Kabul : Cooperation for Peace and Unity (CPAU), 2009.Description: 64 pages ; 30 cmSubject(s): LOC classification: - Pamphlet DS371.3. L333 2009
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Monograph
|
Afghanistan Centre at Kabul University | Pamphlet DS371.3.L333 2009 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 3ACKU000398288 |
Browsing Afghanistan Centre at Kabul University shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| Pamphlet DS371.3.G673 2003 Afghanistan country security situation report for the period 26 Jan-03 Feb 03 / Joe Gordon. | Pamphlet DS371.3.K364 2015 Talking with the Taliban : | Pamphlet DS371.3.K379 2010 Afghan village force : | Pamphlet DS371.3.L333 2009 Independent report for the Department of International Development (DFID) : | Pamphlet DS371.3.L48 2011 Letter dated 20 December 2011 from the chair of the Security Council Committee pursuant to resolutions 1267 (1999) and 1989 (2011) concerning Al-Qaida and associated individuals and entities addressed to the president of the Security Council. | Pamphlet DS371.3.L833 2012 When civilians become willful targets of an insurgency / | Pamphlet DS371.3.M338 2002 Afghanistan, the Taliban and the Bush oil team / |
Cover title.
“Report 14th August 2009”.
“Note: this is an independent consultancy report and does not represent official British government policy”—cover page.
“Why do men join the Taliban and Hizb-i Islami? ; how much do local communities support them?”—cover page.
“Includes bibliography”—(pages 54-59).
Summary: “This study focuses on Afghanistan and is one of a series that DFID has commissioned to examine frequently given hypotheses for radicalisation. Radicalisation is here defined as ‘the social processes by which people are brought to condone, legitimize, support or carry out violence for political or religious objectives’. The focus in this study is on why men join armed groups that present as religiously motivated, and how much support there is for this form their wider communities…”—(page 3).
English