Negotiating with the Taliban : toward a solution for the Afghan conflict / Talatek Masadykov, Antonio Giustozzi, James Michael page.
Material type: TextLanguage: Series: (Crisis States Working papers series No. 2)Publication details: London : Development Studies Institute (DESTIN), 2010.Description: 22 p. ; 30 cmISBN:- 17491797
- 17491800
- Pamphlet DS371.4. M373 2010
Item type | Current library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Monograph | Afghanistan Centre at Kabul University | Pamphlet DS371.4.M373 2010 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 00035524 |
Browsing Afghanistan Centre at Kabul University shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Pamphlet DS371.4.M354 2013 Afghanistan as a cultural crossroads : | Pamphlet DS371.4.M359 2001 IV. massacre in Yakaolang. | Pamphlet DS371.4.M359 2011 Challenges of political development in Afghanistan : | Pamphlet DS371.4.M373 2010 Negotiating with the Taliban : | Pamphlet DS371.4.M378 1989 Assessment visit of information co-ordinator to Pakistan 27th February-16th March 1989 / | Pamphlet DS371.4.M378 2003 Defending against anarchy : | Pamphlet DS371.4.M388 2003 Afghanistan : |
Cover title.
“January 2010”.
“Working Paper no. 66 ; development as state-making”—cover page.
Includes bibliographical references.
Summary: “This paper discusses the debate on reconciliation and negotiations with the Taliban, its future prospects and the role of the United Nations within it. It provides an outline of the current conflict as well as a discussion of the role of the UN and ISAF within it, from both a political and a legal perspective. We argue that the very fact the conflict in its various phases has been going on for so long offers opportunities for reconciliation. The bulk of the paper is inevitably dedicated to analysing the position of the different actors vis-à-vis negotiations. We deal with both pro-Afghan government and anti-government players, as well as with international actors. We review in detail past initiatives aimed towards reconciliation and explain why they did not succeed. In our conclusion we highlight some possible future steps to be taken”—(p. 2).