Mid-term review : Transitional Islamic State of Afghanistan-UNICEF Country Programme of Cooperation 2003-2005.

Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: [Kabul] : UNICEF Country Programme of Cooperation, 2004.Description: 67 pages ; 30 cmSubject(s): LOC classification:
  • Pamphlet HN670.6. Z9.
Contents:
Contents: Executive summary—I. MTR objectives and preparation process—II. Update on the situation of children and women in Afghanistan—III. Progress and key results—IV. Resources used : implementation of the planned budget—V. constraints/opportunities affecting progress, including lessons learnt—VI. Recommendations and adjustments made.
Summary: Summary: “In the UNICEF Country Programme of Cooperation (CP 2003-2005). The mid-term review (MTR) represents a critical milestone, providing the foundation for planning of the next country programme. The MTR process, which began in mid-2004, was analytical and participatory, emphasizing high-quality input and critical reflection with government counterparts. Other United Nations Agencies, donors and NGOs…”—(page 5).
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Status Date due Barcode Item holds
Monograph Monograph Afghanistan Centre at Kabul University Pamphlet HN670.6.Z9.M535 2004 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Available 3ACKU000127729
Total holds: 0

Cover title.
“30 November 2004”.

Includes bibliographical references.

Contents: Executive summary—I. MTR objectives and preparation process—II. Update on the situation of children and women in Afghanistan—III. Progress and key results—IV. Resources used : implementation of the planned budget—V. constraints/opportunities affecting progress, including lessons learnt—VI. Recommendations and adjustments made.

Summary: “In the UNICEF Country Programme of Cooperation (CP 2003-2005). The mid-term review (MTR) represents a critical milestone, providing the foundation for planning of the next country programme. The MTR process, which began in mid-2004, was analytical and participatory, emphasizing high-quality input and critical reflection with government counterparts. Other United Nations Agencies, donors and NGOs…”—(page 5).

English