Determining project impact : assignment report / Jim Murphrey.

By: Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publication details: Peshawar, Pakistan : Agriculture and Rural Rehabilitation (ARR), 1992.Description: [3] unnumbered pages, 19 pages ; 29 cmSubject(s): LOC classification:
  • Pamphlet HN670.6. Z9.
Contents:
Contents: I. Overview of assignment—II. Executive summary of recommendations—III. Major activities and accomplishments—IV. Major problems identified—V. Major resources for establishing an effective impact evaluation capability—VI. Monitoring and measuring impact—VII. Impact evaluation and strategic planning unit (IESPU) recommended—VIII. Review of project cost—IX. Persons contacted—X. Acknowledgments—XI. Annexes.
Summary: Summary: “Field offices of ARR and PSA should be located together or near each other in the main provincial centers. Two to three priority areas in each province should be selected where joint efforts of project assistance and impact evaluation should be done. The exact location in the provincial priority selected areas of work and monitoring should be located using Global Position System (GPS) units to allow for proper follow…”—(page 1).
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Date due Barcode Item holds
Monograph Monograph Afghanistan Centre at Kabul University Pamphlet HN670.6.Z9.M877 1992 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 2 Available 3ACKU000032382
Monograph Monograph Afghanistan Centre at Kabul University Available 3ACKU000113984
Total holds: 0

“May 30, 1992”—title page.
Spiral bound.
“Cooperative agreement No. 306-0204-A-00-0767-00 USAID/Afghanistan cross-border program ; Agriculture Sector Support Project ; Agriculture and Rural Rehabilitation (ARR) ; Volunteers in Technical Assistance”—title page.

Contents: I. Overview of assignment—II. Executive summary of recommendations—III. Major activities and accomplishments—IV. Major problems identified—V. Major resources for establishing an effective impact evaluation capability—VI. Monitoring and measuring impact—VII. Impact evaluation and strategic planning unit (IESPU) recommended—VIII. Review of project cost—IX. Persons contacted—X. Acknowledgments—XI. Annexes.

Summary: “Field offices of ARR and PSA should be located together or near each other in the main provincial centers. Two to three priority areas in each province should be selected where joint efforts of project assistance and impact evaluation should be done. The exact location in the provincial priority selected areas of work and monitoring should be located using Global Position System (GPS) units to allow for proper follow…”—(page 1).

English