Strategy for the Afghanistan Agricultural Sector Support Project (ASSP) / prepared for the U.S. Agency for International Development.
Material type: TextPublication details: Washington, D.C. : Development Alternatives, Inc., 1990. Description: 31 p. : maps ; 28 cmSubject(s): LOC classification:- Pamphlet S471. A3.
Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Monograph | Afghanistan Centre at Kabul University | Available | 3ACKU000356500 | |||||
Monograph | Afghanistan Centre at Kabul University | Pamphlet S471.A3.S773 1990 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 2 | Available | 00001536 |
Browsing Afghanistan Centre at Kabul University shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Pamphlet S471.A3.S58 1960 Encouraging agricultural extension : | Pamphlet S471.A3.S65 1983 Product handling of dried fruits and edible nuts in the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan / | Pamphlet S471.A3.S65 1992 Post harvest technology training course and apricot project evaluation report / | Pamphlet S471.A3.S773 1990 Strategy for the Afghanistan Agricultural Sector Support Project (ASSP) / | Pamphlet S471.A3.S838 1990 Statement of qualifications for rural rehabilitation project : | Pamphlet S471.A3.S878 1964 Survey of population and agricultural characteristics of a sample of 413 villages in Afghanistan / | Pamphlet S471.A3.S878 1972 Survey of fertilizer warehouse and transport requirements in Afghanistan : |
Cover title.
“April 1990”.
Contents: Executive summary—I. Afghanistan Agricultural Sector Support Project—II. Private Sector Agribusiness component (PSA)—III. Programming, Planning and Analysis component (PPA)—IV. The Agricultural Development and Training component (ADT)—Organigrams—Figure.
Summary: “The Agricultural Sector Support Project (ASSP) responds to the need to reconstruct and rehabilitate rural Afghanistan. Ten years of war, dislocation of millions, destruction of the irrigation system, roads, storage facilities, and houses, has reduced agricultural output to less than half its pre-war product…”—(p. 1).