MARC details
000 -LEADER |
fixed length control field |
02695nam a2200289Ia 4500 |
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER |
control field |
OSt |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION |
control field |
20160313031817.0 |
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
fixed length control field |
120912s9999 xx 000 0 und d |
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE |
Transcribing agency |
ACKU |
043 ## - GEOGRAPHIC AREA CODE |
Geographic area code |
a-af--- |
082 ## - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER |
Classification number |
Pamphlet HV 555 .A3 .S637/.2009 |
110 ## - MAIN ENTRY--CORPORATE NAME |
Corporate name or jurisdiction name as entry element |
Oxfam America. |
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT |
Title |
Smart development in Afghanistan : field report from Afghanistan / Oxfam America. |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) |
Place of publication, distribution, etc |
Boston : Oxfam America Headquarters, 2009. |
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION |
Extent |
9 p. : ill. ; 30 cm. |
440 ## - SERIES STATEMENT/ADDED ENTRY--TITLE |
Volume number/sequential designation |
Series (Field report). |
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE |
General note |
Summary: This report aims to convey the views of people who have extensive experience with US development aid to Afghanistan. Forty people were interviewed in Kabul in November and December 2008. They included employees of the US Agency for International Development (USAID), other foreign donors, contractors, consulting companies, and Afghan and international nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), many of whom have several years of experience working in Afghanistan, as well as Afghan government officials. Several interviewees made the important point that all major donors struggle to achieve their objectives in Afghanistan. Despite difficulties, many interviewees believed there were key areas where the US could substantially increase the effectiveness and impact of its assistance, including with respect to the purpose of aid, issues of modernization, and ownership. |
|
General note |
• Purpose. Interviewees were concerned about the US using aid for security objectives; overemphasizing short-term goals instead of long-term development; and overlooking sectors, like agriculture and rural trade, that support the livelihoods of most Afghan households |
|
General note |
• Modernization. Despite some laudable efforts in Afghanistan, US aid practitioners are bound by structures and strategies that often constrain their ability to work effectively on the ground. In particular, interviewees raised their concerns that USAID’s contracting system relies too much on private contractors. |
|
General note |
• Ownership. Good development helps people help themselves, but US assistance tends to be too supply-driven and is overly reliant on contractors and Provincial Reconstruction Teams to deliver development assistance, rather than being led by Afghans themselves. (Executive summary). |
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
Topical term or geographic name as entry element |
Humanitarian assistance – Afghanistan – Evaluation. |
|
Topical term or geographic name as entry element |
Economic assistance – Afghanistan – Evaluation. |
|
Topical term or geographic name as entry element |
Postwar reconstruction – Afghanistan. |
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS |
Uniform Resource Identifier |
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2458/azu_acku_pamphlet_hv_555_a3_s637_2009 ">http://dx.doi.org/10.2458/azu_acku_pamphlet_hv_555_a3_s637_2009 </a> |
Electronic format type |
PDF |
906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN) |
a |
9558 |
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
Source of classification or shelving scheme |
Library of Congress Classification |
Koha item type |
Monograph |
Call number prefix |
azu_acku_pamphlet_hv_555_a3_s637_2009 |